| Cliodhna Quigley | Neurobiopsychology Department, Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrueck |
| Selim Onat | Neurobiopsychology Department, Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrueck |
| Sue Harding | Speech and Hearing Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield |
| Martin Cooke | Speech and Hearing Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield |
| Peter König | Neurobiopsychology Department, Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrueck |
How do different sources of information arising from different modalities interact to control where we look? To answer this question with respect to real-world operational conditions we presented natural images and spatially localized sounds in (V)isual, Audio-visual (AV) and (A)uditory conditions and measured subjects' eye-movements. Our results demonstrate that eye-movements in AV conditions are spatially biased towards the part of the image corresponding to the sound source. Interestingly, this spatial bias is dependent on the probability of a given image region to be fixated (saliency) in the V condition. This indicates that fixation behaviour during the AV conditions is the result of an integration process. Regression analysis shows that this integration is best accounted for by a linear combination of unimodal saliencies.
Received: November 14, 2007
Published: September 17, 2008
C. Quigley, S. Onat, S. Harding, M. Cooke & P. König (2008). Audio-visual integration during overt visual attention. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 1(2):4, 1-17.
Eye movements
Attention
Crossmodal integration
Four sample auditory stimuli. These files contain the same sound (a 4 second extract from Bag_1.mp3) but each was processed to originate from a different artificial source location, as described in the Methods section. The name of the file indicates the location of the sound source relative to the listener.
Down left
Down right
Up left
Up right